Right Of First Refusal Distribution Agreement

Right Of First Refusal Distribution Agreement

There are a large number of types of contracts that may include a right to a first refusal clause, including: Another provision that may be useful to the manufacturer would be a provision that contains concrete grounds for termination. Many state statutes allow termination as long as the producer has a “reasonable reason” to do so. Some conditions that may be part of a distribution agreement to justify its termination are: In a seminar we participated in, a lawyer from a very large company told an interesting story. The company had always entered into oral distribution agreements on the basis of a handshake. It decided to write an agreement to commemorate the exact relationship with its distributors. The lawyer said the exercise was very bad. Distributors (and even some people in the company) interpreted the company`s desire for a written agreement as a sign of mistrust; whereas, for many years, the parties have built their relationship on feelings of mutual trust. The company implicitly rejected the idea of a written agreement because it simply did not work for it. Note, however, that in this situation, the parties involved have already had a long history of oral collusion on the basis of a handshake. This is a different situation from a cleaner slate. In the business world, the rights of the first rejection are often seen in joint venture situations. Partners in a joint venture generally have the right to refuse to buy shares of other partners who leave the company.

Similarly, as part of a shareholders` agreement, a ROFO grants unsold shareholders the right to acquire stakes in selling shareholders before they are offered to the public. The rights to the trial refusal clauses are similar to option contracts, because the holder has the right, but not the obligation, to make a transaction that generally includes an asset. The person with this right has the opportunity to enter into a contract or agreement on an asset before others can. Many other variants are possible. A fully developed ROFR deals with all types of problems and others, and in the case of valuable or complex transactions, it is negotiated and audited by commercial transaction lawyers. However, many ROFRRs are not fully specified. Even the best-developed ROFR agreements suffer from a high risk of litigation and litigation, as they anticipate future transactions and contingencies that are not known when the ROFR originates.


Comments are closed.